Hello, We are writing to share that we have updated our FAQ to include additional information and clarity about written buyer agreements. As you know, as a part of our settlement, we have agreed to require MLS participants working with buyers to enter into written agreements with their buyers before touring a home. We’ve included the latest questions we’ve answered below for your use. These have also been added to our resource hub on www.facts.realtor and are listed as questions 46 through 62 in our regularly updated FAQ page. We will be releasing additional guidance about the timing of the practice changes required under the settlement in the coming days. As a reminder, we received preliminary approval of the settlement on April 24, but it is still subject to final court approval. The final approval hearing is scheduled for November 26, 2024. As always, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me or my team. Thank you, Katie |
The following Q&A has been developed for NAR Members. Please direct any media inquiries about this to NAR’s communications team. |
The practice change requiring written agreements with buyers is triggered by two conditions: it only applies to MLS participants “working with” buyers and is triggered by “touring a home.” What does it mean to be “working with” a buyer? |
The “working with” language is intended to distinguish MLS participants who provide brokerage services to a buyer — such as identifying potential properties, arranging for the buyer to tour a property, performing or facilitating negotiations on behalf of the buyer, presenting offers by the buyer, or other services for the buyer —from MLS participants who simply market their services or just talk to a buyer — like at an open house or by providing an unrepresented buyer access to a house they have listed.
|
If the MLS participant is working only as an agent or subagent of the seller, then the participant is not “working with the buyer.” In that scenario, an agreement is not required because the participant is performing work for the seller and not the buyer.
|
How will state laws affect the implementation of the practice change requiring written agreements with buyers? |
What does it mean to tour a home? |
Touring a home means when the buyer and/or the MLS participant, or other agent, at the direction of the MLS participant working with the buyer, enter(s) the house. This includes when the MLS participant or other agent, at the direction of the MLS participant, working with the buyer enters the home to provide a live, virtual tour to a buyer not physically present.
|
Does the requirement for a written agreement with buyers mean that MLS participants and buyers must enter into a written agency agreement? |
- What type of relationship the professional has with the potential buyer (e.g., agency, non-agency, subagency, transactional, customer).
- The term of the agreement (e.g., one day, one month, one house, one zip code).
- The services to be provided (e.g., ministerial acts, a certain number of showings, negotiations, presenting offers).
- The compensation charged (e.g., $0, X flat fee, X percent, X hourly rate).
|
If an MLS participant hosts an open house or provides access to a property, on behalf of the seller only, to an unrepresented buyer, will they be required to enter into a written agreement with those buyers touring the home? |
Are written buyer agreements required when listing agents talk with a buyer on behalf of a seller only or as subagents of the seller? |
No. If the MLS participant is working only as an agent or subagent of the seller, then the participant is not working for the buyer. In that scenario, an agreement is not required because the participant is performing work for the seller and not the buyer.
|
Are written buyer agreements required when MLS participants perform ministerial acts? |
Are written buyer agreements required in a dual agency scenario, when a single agent works both for the seller and for the buyer? |
Are written buyer agreements required in a designated agency scenario, when a single broker works both for the seller and for the buyer, and designates an agent to represent the buyer? |
MLS participants may not receive compensation for services from any source that exceeds the amount or rate agreed to in the buyer agreement. Does this mean that brokerages can only have one agreement with the buyer? |
- What type of relationship the professional has with the potential buyer (e.g., agency, non-agency, subagency, transactional, customer).
- The term of the agreement (e.g., one day, one month, one house, one zip code).
- The services to be provided (e.g., ministerial acts, a certain number of showings, negotiations, presenting offers).
- The compensation charged (e.g., $0, X flat fee, X percent, X hourly rate).
|
In the buyer agreement, can buyers and buyer brokers agree to a range of compensation? |
NAR policy will not dictate the compensation agreed between buyers and buyer brokers (e.g., $0, X flat fee, X percent, X hourly rate).
|
Under the settlement, any compensation agreed to must be objectively ascertainable and not open-ended. For example, the range cannot be “buyer broker compensation shall be whatever amount the seller is offering to the buyer.”
|
Should active buyer agreements entered into before the MLS policy change be amended to make sure any compensation is not open-ended and is objectively ascertainable? |
Should active buyer agreements entered into before the MLS policy change be amended to remove any provision that authorizes the buyer broker to keep any offers of compensation exceeding the amount of compensation agreed with the buyer? |
Should active listing or buyer agreements entered into before the MLS policy change be amended to include a conspicuous disclosure that compensation is not set by law and is fully negotiable? |
Can buyers and buyer brokers rely on an offer of compensation that was on the MLS prior to the effective date of the MLS policy changes? |
But if the sales contract is not signed before the date the participant’s MLS implements the policy changes, the offer on the MLS will not be valid and buyers and buyer brokers may wish to protect themselves in writing with the listing broker or seller through a broker agreement or by including the offer of compensation in the sales contract.
|
Does the settlement agreement’s requirement of “objectively ascertainable” and “not open-ended” apply to listing agreements or the compensation sellers pay listing brokers? |
No. Unlike the settlement agreement’s requirements that compensation in buyer agreements be objectively ascertainable and not open-ended, listing agreements can be structured however the seller and listing broker agree, so long as the listing agreement complies with the law, pre-existing MLS policy, and “specifies the amount or rate of any payment” from the seller to the listing broker.
|
Should active listing agreements entered into before the MLS policy change be amended to address the settlement agreement’s prohibition on offers of compensation being communicated on the MLS? |
If the listing agreement instructs the listing broker to make an offer of compensation without reference to the MLS, no change to the listing agreement is needed, as the listing broker can comply with that instruction without violating the MLS policy change.
|
But if the listing agreement specifies that offers of compensation be made “on the MLS,” then the listing broker should work with the seller to amend the listing agreement before the MLS policy change is implemented, to make it clear the listing broker will not make an offer of compensation on the MLS and will not be violating the listing agreement by failing to make an offer of compensation on the MLS.
|
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment